HEALTH & HOSP. CORP. ETC. v. Marion County
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bayh v. Sonnenburg (Ind. 1991)
- S.E.D. v. Grant County Department of Welfare (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
- Cohn v. Dept. of Professional Regulation (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
The Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing of our decision in Health and Hosp. Corp. v. Marion County (1984), Ind.App., 470 N.E.2d 1348, charges us with having erroneously applied the doctrine of implied contract against a county. While our supreme court has held that the doctrine of implied contract cannot be invoked against a county, it has approved and utilized the doctrine of quasi-contract, or contract implied in law, against such an entity. Thus, we properly applied the doctrine of quasi-contract in our opinion. See Board of Comm’rs v. Greensburg Times (1939), 215 Ind. 471, 19 N.E.2d 459.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.