Indiana Court of Appeals, 2007

Roob v. Fisher

Roob v. Fisher
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided May 21, 2007 · Baker, Vaidik, Crone
866 N.E.2d 781; 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 1023; 2007 WL 1462388 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Roob v. Fisher

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

BAKER, Chief Judge.

In our original published opinion, we concluded that neither Medicaid Providers nor Recipients have a private right of action pursuant to Section 1983. Roob v. Fisher, 856 N.E.2d 723 (Ind.Ct.App. 2006). The Appellees have filed a petition for rehearing in which they point out that the State conceded the issue of Recipient standing at the trial court level. Moreover, the State did not explicitly challenge the Recipients’ standing in its opening appellate brief. We concluded in our original opinion that the State’s limited mention of the Recipients in its opening brief was sufficient to keep the issue alive. Id. at 732-33. In light of the State’s concession below, however, we now find that it has waived the issue of the Recipients’ standing. Thus, we grant rehearing for the limited purpose of vacating that portion of our original opinion that holds that the Recipients do not have standing in this matter. In all other respects, we deny the petition for rehearing.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed with respect to the Recipients, reversed with respect to the Providers, and remanded for proceedings consistent with our original opinion as modified by this opinion on rehearing.

VAIDIK, J., and CRONE, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.