Indiana Court of Appeals, 2012

B.C. v. State of Indiana

B.C. v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals · Decided August 31, 2012

B.C. v. State of Indiana

Opinion

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: JEFFREY E. STRATMAN GREGORY F. ZOELLER Aurora, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana J.T. WHITEHEAD Deputy Attorney General FILED Indianapolis, Indiana Aug 31 2012, 9:18 am IN THE CLERK COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

B.C., ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. 15A01-1202-JV-68 ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Appellee-Petitioner. )

APPEAL FROM THE DEARBORN CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable James D. Humphrey, Judge Cause No. 15C01-0805-JD-102 and 15C01-0806-JD-103

August 31, 2012

MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

KIRSCH, Judge B.C. appeals the trial court’s order requiring him to register as a sex offender contending that the order was premature and was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. The State concedes that the order is premature and should be vacated. A sex offender registry hearing for a juvenile may be conducted only after the juvenile has been released from a juvenile detention facility or discharged from a secure private facility. B.W. v. State, 909 N.E.2d 471, 477 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). Here, the trial court ordered B.C. placed in Wernle Children’s facility, a secure private facility. He has not been released from the facility, and the trial court order is premature. We vacate the trial court’s registration order and remand with instructions.

Vacated and remanded.

NAJAM, J., and MAY, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.