Ferguson v. Warden
Ferguson v. Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
KENNETH S. FERGUSON,
Petitioner,
v. CAUSE NO. 1:20-CV-225-HAB-SLC
WARDEN,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER Kenneth S. Ferguson, proceeding pro se, filed a petition to expunge his State convictions under
Ind. Code § 35-38-9. Upon review, the court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the issues raised in in the petition. See Buethe v. Britt Airlines, Inc.,
749 F.2d 1235, 1238(7th Cir. 1984). (“[I]t is axiomatic that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, and that courts must raise the issue sua sponte when it appears that subject matter jurisdiction is lacking.”). As a federal district court, this court has subject matter jurisdiction over claims arising under federal law or for claims where there is diversity of citizenship between the parties.
28 U.S.C. § 1331;
28 U.S.C. § 1332. Ferguson, the sole party in this case, resides in the State of Indiana. Further, the petition seeks relief under State law and contains no indication of any violation of his constitutional or federal rights. As a result, it appears that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, and Ferguson cannot proceed on this petition in this court. For these reasons, the court DISMISSES this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED on September 3, 2020.
s/ Holly A. Brady JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Reference
- Status
- Unknown