DUNIGAN v. HILL
DUNIGAN v. HILL
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION LEE EVANS DUNIGAN, ) Plaintiff, V. No. 1:21-cv-00212-JPH-DML CURTIS T. HILL, Defendant.
Order Plaintiff Lee Dunigan's motion for an order directing Pendleton Correctional Facility staff to release his stimulus check, dkt. [9], is denied. The motion is understood to seek injunctive relief. But his request regarding the stimulus check is not related to the claims in this case and Pendleton Correctional Facility staff are not parties to this case. De Beers Consol. Mines v. United States,
325 U.S. 212, 220(1945) (A preliminary injunction is not appropriate when "it deals with a matter lying wholly outside the issues in the suit."). Further, preliminary relief is not yet available to the plaintiff because "[a]n injunction, like any 'enforcement action,’ may be entered only against a litigant, that is, a party that has been served and is under the jurisdiction of the district court.” Maddox v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.,
528 Fed. Appx. 669, 672(7th Cir. 2013) (quoting Lake Shore Asset Mgmt., Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n,
511 F.3d 762, 767(7th Cir. 2007)). SO ORDERED. Date: 3/4/2021 S\amnu Patruck lanl James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: LEE EVANS DUNIGAN 282570 WABASH VALLEY - CF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 6908 S. Old US Hwy 41 P.O. Box 1111 CARLISLE, IN 47838
Reference
- Status
- Unknown