District Court, S.D. Indiana, 2021

DUNIGAN v. HILL

DUNIGAN v. HILL
District Court, S.D. Indiana · Decided March 4, 2021
DUNIGAN v. HILL

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

LEE EVANS DUNIGAN, )

Plaintiff,

V. No. 1:21-cv-00212-JPH-DML CURTIS T. HILL,

Defendant.

Order

Plaintiff Lee Dunigan's motion for an order directing Pendleton Correctional Facility staff to release his stimulus check, dkt. [9], is denied. The motion is understood to seek injunctive relief. But his request regarding the stimulus check is not related to the claims in this case and Pendleton Correctional Facility staff are not parties to this case. De Beers Consol. Mines v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 220 (1945) (A preliminary injunction is not appropriate when "it deals with a matter lying wholly outside the issues in the suit."). Further, preliminary relief is not yet available to the plaintiff because "[a]n injunction, like any 'enforcement action,’ may be entered only against a litigant, that is, a party that has been served and is under the jurisdiction of the district court.” Maddox v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., 528 Fed. Appx. 669, 672 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting Lake Shore Asset Mgmt., Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 511 F.3d 762, 767 (7th Cir. 2007)).

SO ORDERED.

Date: 3/4/2021

S\amnu Patruck lanl

James Patrick Hanlon

United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution:

LEE EVANS DUNIGAN

282570

WABASH VALLEY - CF

WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

Inmate Mail/Parcels

6908 S. Old US Hwy 41

P.O. Box 1111

CARLISLE, IN 47838

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.