GARG GROUP v. KAUL

District Court, S.D. Indiana

GARG GROUP v. KAUL

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

GARG GROUP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-cv-01530-RLY-MJD ) PAUL KAUL, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On December 13, 2023, Magistrate Judge Dinsmore recommended the court dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Mohammad Abbas and Krystal Entertainment Inc. for failure to prosecute and as a sanction for failing to obey a court order. Plaintiff did not object to this disposition within the 14-day period imposed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2). Accordingly, the court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp.,

170 F.3d 734

, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). After a review of the recommendation and the record, the court finds no clear error. Thus, Magistrate Judge Dinsmore's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 83) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Mohammad Abbas and Krystal Entertainment Inc. are DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove Defendants Mohammad Abbas and Krystal Entertainment Inc. from the caption. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of January 2024.

RICHAR AL. YQUNG, JUDGE United StatesDxStrict Court Southern District of Indiana

Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsels of Record.

Reference

Status
Unknown