Joseph Latham v. Direct Auto, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION JOSEPH LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:25-CV-158-GSL-AZ DIRECT AUTO, et al., Defendants.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abizer Zanzi’s report and recommendation entered on October 29, 2025. [DE 25]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Zanzi recommends that the Court (1) grant Defendants Patrick Ruberry and Litchfield Cavo LLP’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 11], (2) grant Defendant Direct Auto Insurance’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 13], and (3) dismiss this lawsuit without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Zanzi’s report and recommendation in full and orders that Defendants’ motions be GRANTED. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: November 13, 2025 /s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court