Derek Core v. Barnes Sgt.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION DEREK CORE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:24-cv-00621-MPB-MJD ) BARNES Sgt., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Magistrate Judge Dinsmore recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff Derek Core's repeated failure to comply with the court's orders. Dkt. 34. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Dinsmore noted: (1) Mr. Core's failure to respond to any discovery served by Defendant; (2) Mr. Core's failure to appear at a December 11, 2025 hearing in person; and (3) Mr. Core's failure to appear at a January 6, 2026 show cause hearing in person; and (4) Mr. Core's failure to otherwise respond to Magistrate Judge Dinsmore's order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for the preceding failures.
There has not been any objection to the report and recommendation.
The court adopts Magistrate Judge Dinsmore's report and recommendation, dkt. [34], in whole. See GCIU Employer Retirement Fund v. Chicago Tribune Co., 8 F.3d 1195, 1198-99 (7th Cir. 1993) ("[A] party cannot decide for itself when it feels like pressing its action and when it feels like taking a break because trial judges have a responsibility to litigants to keep their court calendars as current as humanly possible.") (quotation marks and citation omitted). This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). The clerk is directed to enter final judgment consistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2026 Wy aye U fp Matthew P. Brookman, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: DEREK CORE 1848 Ludlow Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46201 Eric Ryan Shouse Lewis And Wilkins LLP [email protected]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.