Harlow v. Becktle

Indiana Supreme Court
Harlow v. Becktle, 1 Blackf. 215 (Ind. 1822)
1822 Ind. LEXIS 32

Harlow v. Becktle

Opinion

UPON an affidavit showing the plaintiff in error to be a nonresident, a rule was granted calling on him to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of security for costs.— The security was afterwards given, and the rule discharged (1).

Acc. Harlin's heirs v. Eastland, Hard. 310. Vide Lewis v. Ovens, 5 Barn, & Ald. 265. In an original suit, a non-resident plaintiff must give security for costs, if required by the defendant. Cox v. Hunt, ante, p. 146, and note.

Reference

Status
Published