Cammack v. Rupert
Cammack v. Rupert
Opinion of the Court
Rupert et al. declared in an action of debt against Cammack on a single bond for the payment of a sum of money.
Cammack pleaded in bar, that by á certain writing obligatory made between himself of the first part, a certain Robert Kyle of the second part, and Rupert et al. and other creditors of Cammack, of the third part, it was agreed by Rupert et al. and the other creditors of Cammack, that, in consideration of the assignment by Cammack of all his right and interest in and to a certain policy of insurance executed to Cammack by the
To this plea there, was- a general demurrer. The Circuit Court sustained the demurrer; and rendered a.judgment in favour of Rupert et al. for their debt and damages.
- This judgment is correct. The plea does not profess to allege accord and satisfaction, or a release. It contains no averment of the result of the suit in the Jefferson Circuit Court— whether it be pending or whether it be decided. We know not whether any thing was recovered by Kyle in that súit; or whether if he failed to recover any thing, Cammack has given or attempted -to .give security to Rupert et al. for the payment of 50 cents on the dollar of their debt. Without determining whether the averments of these facts would make the plea good, there can be no. doubt that without them it is bad.
The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent. damages and costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cammack v. Rupert and Another
- Status
- Published