Mann v. Perkins

Indiana Supreme Court
Mann v. Perkins, 4 Blackf. 271 (Ind. 1837)
1837 Ind. LEXIS 18

Mann v. Perkins

Opinion of the Court

REPLEVIN. Pleas, 1st, that the property of the goods was in Solomon Perkins; 2dly, that the defendant was a constable, and as such had taken the property by virtue of an execution issued by a justice of the peace, on a judgment against Solomon Perkins; and that the goods belonged to Solomon Perkins. Held, that the second plea might be rejected on the plaintiff’s motion; it being the same in substance with the first.

Previously to the entry by a justice of a judgment by confession, the judgment-debtor must take an oath respecting the fairness of the judgment as is prescribed by the statute; and the oath must be- filed and entered of record by the justice. Vide Ex parte Knight, Ante, p. 220, and note.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mann v. F. K. Perkins
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published