Summy v. Mulford

Indiana Supreme Court May 24, 1839

Summy v. Mulford, 5 Blackf. 113 (Ind. 1839)

1839 Ind. LEXIS 37

Opinion of the Court

IT was held in this case, that after a party had erected a mill-dam, he could not, under the statute of 1831, have a writ of ad quod damnum. Smith v. Olmstead, ante, p. 37 (1).

The law is now otherwise. The statute of 1842 enacts, “ that it shall be lawful for any person who has already erected a dam, to make application for a writ of ad quod damnum, in like manner as if he were desirous of erecting a dam, but had not already done it.” Acts of 1842, p. 158.

Reference

Full Case Name: Summy v. Mulford and Others.—In error
Status: Published