Fellows v. Kress
Fellows v. Kress
Opinion of the Court
— Assumpsit by Kress against W. and C. Fellows. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
One of the pleas filed by the defendants was a statutory
We think this instruction cannot be sustained. The issues . were whether the note had been discharged by accord and satisfaction, or in any other manner. If the proof sustained either of the issues on the part of the plaintiff, the note was not a valid set-off, otherwise it was. This was a matter for the consideration of the jury under all the circumstances of the case. But they-were told by the Court, that if the note was surrendered to the plaintiff for a valuable consideration, he promising to account for it, the note was not an available set-off. This was saying, that transactions between the parties, which the jury might, or might not, consider as establishing an accord and satisfaction or other discharge of the note, would defeat the set-off. If, indeed, the note had been satisfied, paid, or discharged, and a new, distinct, and valid promise was made by the plaintiff, such promise, and not the note, should have been pleaded as a set-off. But whether the surrender of the note and the other circumstances attending it were a satisfaction, payment, or discharge, should have been left to the jury.
— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Fellows and Another v. Kress
- Status
- Published