Pickering v. Walcott
Pickering v. Walcott
1 Smith & H. 128
Pickering v. Walcott
Opinion of the Court
— “ These proceedings are erroneous. The bill does not give the name of either of the heirs. The statute of 1838, under which the bill ivas filed, required at least the name of one of the heirs to be stated. R. S. 1838, p. 443.
“ There was no order that the suit should be revived. Such an order was necessary before a final decree.”
Decree reversed, &e.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.