Indiana Supreme Court, 1848

Lucas v. Heaton

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1848 · Smith

1 Smith & H. 184

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Blount v. Darrach (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania 1827)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.

— “ As the contract proved, was a special one, for tfe- m livery of specified quantities of flour and bran, and does not ap to have been rescinded, the measure of the damages which in-*185j'laítiüíi' would have been entitled to recen «*r, for a breach of it by the defendants, was the value of the jluiir and bran the former was to receive, and not the price or value of the wheat delivered by him, "We Ihitih. there (ore, the evidence thus offend and rejected, would not líate sun anted Ike cause of action, and would not have entitled the jilaintiil' to a judgment if it had all been admitted. See Ellison v. Dove, 8 Blackf, 571.”

jiufc/nutf u'jjinntd, dec.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.