Seivens v. McCall

Indiana Supreme Court
Seivens v. McCall, 1 Smith & H. 257 (Ind. 1849)

Seivens v. McCall

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— “ The trial of the cause without any answer to the second plea was erroneous. Swan v. Rary, 2 Blackf. 291; Huston v. McPherson, 8 Blackf. 562. It was too late after the trial and judgment to file the replication.”

Judgment reversed, &c.

Reference

Full Case Name
Seivens v. McCall and Another
Status
Published