Goodwin v. Hazzard

Held,

that there was no error in excluding the first mentioned draft, as , it was no evidence of a demand, against the plaintiff unless he bad accepted it, or promised to pay it, and the evidence of Richard Goodwin was too vague to establish such an acceptance or promise.

Held, also, that the instruction given was correct, the due bill being, in effect, payable on demand.

Judgment affirmed, &e.