Tercy v. Strain
Indiana Supreme Court
Tercy v. Strain, 2 Ind. 113 (Ind. 1850)
Tercy v. Strain
Opinion of the Court
THIS was an action of assumpsit brought to recover damages for the non-delivery of a carding machine and fixtures, in accordance with a contract alleged to have been made by the defendant with the plaintiff. There are two counts in the declaration, to both of which demurrers were sustained.
We are of opinion that neither count describes the contract with sufficient clearness to show whether the plaintiff had performed his part of the agreement or •not, as to the payment of the purchase-money or as to
The judgment is affirmed with costs, &c.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tercy v. Strain.—In Error
- Status
- Published