In June, 1848, Chandler, administrator of Sherman, filed in the clerk’s office of the Wa.rren Circuit Court a transcript of the proceedings in a suit in the Probate Court of that county, in which suit Swisher was plaintiff, and Chandler, administrator as aforesaid, was defendant. That transcript states that copies of two promissory notes executed by the intestate, and payable to Swisher, were filed as the cause of action; that, at the November term, 1847, of the Probate Court, the cause was ordered to be docketed, and to stand for trial at the then next term of the Court; that, at the February term, 1848, the cause was continued; and that, at the next May *223term, the parties appeared, and Chandler filed two pleas which led to issues in fact. The said transcript further states, that the parties submitted the cause to the Probate Court, and that judgment was there rendered in favor of Swisher.

Chandler appealed to the Circuit Court.

In the Circuit Court, when the cause was called, Swisher moved for a dismissal of the appeal because there was no assignment of errors. Chandler opposed the motion, on the ground that he had a right to a trial on the merits. The motion was granted.

The only question is, whether the Circuit Court was to try the cause on the merits, or to determine it merely as a Court of error.

Piad the notes sued on been filed in a case where the administrator had put in a petition to settle the estate as insolvent, and the Probate Court had determined that the estate was insolvent, the trial of the appeal would have been on the merits. R. S,. 1843, p. 539. It does not appear, however, that the present is such a case.

There is a statute authorizing suits against administrators to be brought in the Probate Court. R. S. 1843, p, 664. And this suit, as the record presents it, must be considered to have been brought under that statute. In cases so brought, an appeal lies from the judgment of the Probate Court to the Supreme or Circuit Court, at the option of the appellant, but the Court to which the appeal is taken acts only as a Court of error. R. S. 1843, pp.668-9.

This cause was before the Circuit Court as a Court of error, and was disposed of by that Court as a Court of error. The consequence is, that we have no jurisdiction of the case.

The writ of error is dismissed.