Steele v. State ex rel. Graham
Steele v. State ex rel. Graham
Opinion of the Court
Graham, made complaint on oath, praying for surety of the peace against Steele.
The Circuit Court overruled a motion to quash the affidavit, and upon hearing the evidence, ordered Sleele to enter into recognizance to keep the peace, &c.
The only question arising upon the record, is as to the sufficiency of the affidavit. The language of the affidavit, so far as it is necessary to quote it to present the point in dispute, is, that the “affiant verily believes and actually fears, and has just cause to fear and apprehend, that the said Justin Steele will kill him, said affiant, or do him great bodily injury, or procure others to do so,” &c.
This mode of stating the charge violates the familiar rule, well established in civil as well as criminal proceed
The affidavit should have been quashed.
The judgment is reversed with costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Steele v. The State, on the complaint of Graham
- Status
- Published