Zehnor v. Crull
Zehnor v. Crull
Opinion of the Court
This was an action by Crull against Zehnor upon promissory notes for the payment of 207 dollars. The defendant’s answer contains three paragraphs. The
The action of the Court in overruling the demurrers is assigned for error; but as no exception to that ruling appears to have been taken in the Circuit Court, the objection to the replies cannot be raised in this Court. 8 Ind. R. 96. —9 Id. 117. Another objection is raised to the ruling of the Court, by assignment of error; but the appellant has faffed to notice the point made in a brief; hence it will be considered as waived. Rule 28. — Ind. Dig. 722.
The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.