Carter v. Simons
Carter v. Simons
Opinion of the Court
Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgage was to secure the payment of two notes, due at different times. The first note was due; the second, by ap
Subsequently, the defendant appeared, and moved to set aside the default, and grant a trial, simply on the ground that the judgment rendered was erroneous. The Court denied the motion. The judgment was not erroneous. Hunt v. Harding, 11 Ind. R. 245.—Allen v. Parker, id. 504.
~ The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.