This was a bill in chancery, filed under the former practice, but tried since the taking effect of the present code. The cause was tried by the Court, and there was a finding and judgment, in respect to some matters involved, for the defendants. The complainants moved for a new trial, but no written reasons therefor appear to have been filed. The rulings alleged to have been erroneous, should have been presented as the ground of the motion for a new trial. Vide Kent v. Lawson, at the present term (1).

There having been no written reasons for a new trial, filed in the Court below, no question is presented for con*615sideration here. Howes v. Halliday, 10 Ind. R. 339. See, also, McGregor v. Axe, id. 362.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.