Indiana Supreme Court, 1859

Snodgrass v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1859

13 Ind. 393

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Cornell v. Bonsall (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1917)
Manufacturers' Bottle Co. v. Taylor-Stites Glass Co. (Mass. 1911)
Banigan v. Woonsocket Rubber Company (R.I. 1899)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

__ Per Curiam.

This case falls, perhaps, within those of Lindley v. Dakin, at this term (1), and Allen v. Lee, 1 Ind. R. 58, as modified and explained by Medler v. Hiatt, 8 id. 171. But if not, an award barred.

J. S. Reid and J. F, Gardner, for the appellant. J. Yaryan, for the appellee.

The submission to arbitration of the question of damages for an admitted incumbrance upon' property sold as free of incumbrance, is not within the prohibition of § 2, 2 R. S. p. 228.

A prior suit pending for a set-off, would prevent its being pleaded to a subsequent. Rankin v. Halpin, 4 Ind. R. 585.

The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Ante, 388.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.