Cline v. Inlow

Indiana Supreme Court
Cline v. Inlow, 14 Ind. 419 (Ind. 1860)
Hanna, Jper

Cline v. Inlow

Opinion of the Court

Hanna, J.

Suit on notes and to foreclose a mortgage.

Answer, that the mortgage had not been recorded within ninety days, and that afterwards the defendant sold said lands to one Brown in good faith and for a valuable consideration, who was in possession and was a necessary party, &c.

Demurrer to the answer sustained.

The answer was not sufficient. If it had been sufficient to prevent a foreclosure, it was not a valid defense against a recovery of judgment on the notes, and would, therefore, be bad, having been pleaded in answer to the whole complaint. But it was not an answer to the prayer for a foreclosure. If Brown had any rights, distinct from those of the defendant, they would not be concluded by a proceeding to which he was not a party. He was not, therefore, a necessary party; whether a proper party upon his own application, we need not decide.

$. c. Willson and J. E. McDonald, for the appellant. jper Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published