Lucas v. Dangerfield
Lucas v. Dangerfield
Opinion of the Court
Lucas sued the appellees before a justice of the peace, in an action of replevin for certain wheat. Appeal to the Common Pleas, where there was a trial by jury; verdict and judgment for the defendants, a new trial being refused.
This evidence was rejected, but on what ground does not appear. We do not perceive, any valid objection to the evidence offered, and none has been pointed out to us. We think the evidence was pertinent and relevant, and that it should have been admitted.
Per Ouriam. — The judgment below is reversed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.