City of Lafayette v. Bush
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Delphi v. Evans (Ind. 1871)
- Hubbell v. City of Des Moines (Iowa 1915)
- City of Valparaiso v. Hagen (Ind. 1899)
- Parke v. City of Seattle (Wash. 1892)
- City Council of Montgomery v. Townsend (Ala. 1887)
- City of Kokomo v. Mahan (Ind. 1885)
- City of Evansville v. Decker (Ind. 1882)
- Weis v. City of Madison (Ind. 1881)
- Cummins v. City of Seymour (Ind. 1881)
- City of Pontiac v. Carter (Mich. 1875)
- City of Lafayette v. Shultz (Ind. 1873)
- English v. Smock (Ind. 1870)
- City of Vincennes v. Richards (Ind. 1864)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This was au action by Bush and Wife against The City of Lafayette, and those acting under her, to enjoin the city from using and appropriating certain lots of Mrs. Bush, to the purpose of a street, no compensation having been assessed or tendered. An injunction was granted, to operate until the final hearing, and from the interlocutory order thus granting an injunction, this appeal is taken.
It is now well settled, that a city can not be enjoined from changing the grade of a street, or making any alteration
Such, however, is not the case before us. Here the city •is appropriating parts of the lots of Mrs. Bush, to the purposes of a street, and digging and excavating them for that purpose. Provision is made for assessing and tendering damages in such cases, and the city can not thus appropriate the property of the plaintiff, without first complying with such provision. 1 G-. & H. Stat., p. 231, sec. 59*, et seq.
The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.