Indiana Supreme Court, 1863

Hoot v. Spade

Hoot v. Spade
Indiana Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1863
20 Ind. 326
Hoot v. Spade

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment for the defendant.

John Id. Baker and Myron Baker, for the appellants.1

The following established legal propositions dispose of the' questions arising in the cause.

1. Where there is a failure of title to a part of a tract of land purchased and taken possession of, and there is’ not a rescission of the contract on that account, the measure of damages on eviction from such part, in the absence of special circumstances, is a sum bearing the same proportion to the price ofTFe whole that such part bears to the entire tract of land. Philips v. Reichert, 17 Ind. 120; Dodds v. Toner, 3 Ind. 427.

2. After the jury has been sworn and a part of the evidence heard, it is too late for either party to amend by adding a new cause of action or defence, to be examined in the pending trial. Miles v. Vanhorn, 17 Ind. 245; The Danville, &c. v. The State, 16 id. 456.

3. Where the issues are altered after the jury is sworn, the jury must be re-sworn before hearing the cause. Kerschbaugher v. Slusser, 12 Ind. 453.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, with leave to amend, &c.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.