Bish v. Johnson
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Norton v. Union Traction Co. (Ind. 1915)
- Gabhart v. Gabhart (Ind. 1977)
- Kirby v. Saginaw Hotels Co. (Mich. 1931)
- In re Interborough Consolidated Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1921)
- Bonner v. Terre Haute & I. R. (7th Cir. 1907)
- Hale v. Cheshire Railroad (Mass. 1894)
- Pope v. Board of Com'rs (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana 1892)
- Board of Commissioners v. Center Township (Ind. 1885)
- Atchison, Colorado & Pacific Railroad v. Board of Commissioners of Phillips County (Kan. 1881)
- City of Mount Vernon v. Hovey (Ind. 1876)
- Mowrey v. Indianapolis & C. R. (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana 1866)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this case proceedings supplementary to execution were instituted by appellants against the Cincinnati and Chicago Railroad Company and the Cincinnati, Newcastle and Michigan Railroad Company, and also against said appellee, to subject to the payment of judgments obtained by the appellants against said corporations, the proceeds of certain stock subscriptions made by said Johnson to the capital stock of the latter company, and remaining unpaid.
It is averred that the said subscription was made in March, 1853; that in April, 1854, said company last above named consolidated with the Cincinnati, Cambridge and Chicago Short Line Railroad Company, under the name first above set forth, and that afterwards, in 1854, said company and the Cincinnati, Logansport and Chicago Railroad Company consolidated under the name first above set forth.
These facts appear in the complaint. An answer was filed by said Johnson, the second paragraph of which avers that the judgments, of which payment is sought, were obtained after said consolidations, and that said consolidations were “made against his wishes and consent.” A demurrer was Overruled to said second paragraph of the answer, which presents the only point in the case. This subscription was made after the act of February 23, 1853, authorizing the consolidation of railroad companies, and consequently must be viewed as having been made with reference to the said authority so
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.