Indiana Supreme Court, 1864

Pattison v. Wilson

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1864

22 Ind. 358

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Roush v. Layton (Ind. 1875)
Bartholomew v. Loy (Ind. 1873)
Sanders v. Loy (Ind. 1873)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This was an application by the appellant under section 356, p. 215, 2 G-. & EL, for a new trial within a year after judgment. The application is based on newly discovered evidence. The complaint for the new trial does not profess to contain all the evidence given on the former trial, not even all upon the points upon which the new trial is sought. A demurrer was, for this reason, properly sustained *359to said complaint. Cox v. Hutchings, 21 Ind. p. 219; Glidewell v. Daggy, id. 95.

Clay fool, Clarice, McDonald $ JRoache, for the appellant. Hendricks § Hovd, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.