Lingerman v. Nave
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Green v. State Highway Commission (Kan. 1959)
- Pierce v. Manning (S.D. 1892)
- Carson v. Funk (Kan. 1882)
- Ferrenburg v. Studabaker Turnpike Co. (Ind. 1871)
- Tyner v. Adams (Ind. 1870)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Suit by Have against the appellants, on a promissory note. Issues were formed, the trial of which resulted in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff below; a motion for a new trial being overruled.
The judgment must be affirmed. The only errors complained of relate to matter’s occurring on the trial, and for which a new trial was prayed; but the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error. Ho question, therefore, is properly raised by the assignment of errors.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.