Indiana Supreme Court, 1870

Thompson v. Honey Creek Draining Co.

Thompson v. Honey Creek Draining Co.
Indiana Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1870 · Frazer
33 Ind. 268
Thompson v. Honey Creek Draining Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Frazer, J.

The exhibit ā€œ Dā€ annexed to the complaint is the instrument upon which the action was founded. It amounts to nothing, and is wholly insufficient. It is with*269out signature or the affidavit which the statute imperatively requires to give it validity. Besides, it does not even purport to be what the complaint avers. The demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained.

R. W. Sill, S. A. Huff, and B. W. Langdon, for appellant. S. E. Perkins, O. F. Baker, and S. E. Perkins, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment accordingly, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.