Conner v. Wall
Conner v. Wall
37 Ind. 252
Conner v. Wall
Opinion of the Court
This was an action by the appellee
John C. Conner alone appeals, arid assigns for error the following only: ‘fNow comes the appellant and says there is manifest error in the record and proceedings, in this, that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.”
No authorities need be cited to the point that no question is raised by this assignment of error. The error should have' been assigned upon the overruling of a motion for anew trial.
The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.