Manford v. Pleasant Grove & Indian Creek Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court
Manford v. Pleasant Grove & Indian Creek Turnpike Co., 42 Ind. 293 (Ind. 1873)
Osborn

Manford v. Pleasant Grove & Indian Creek Turnpike Co.

Opinion of the Court

Osborn, C. J.

The main questions in this case were, fully considered in Hopkins v. The Greensburgh, Kingston, and Clarksburg Turnpike Co., 40 Ind. 44, and The Greensburgh, Milford, and Hope Turnpike Co. v. Sidener, 40 Ind. 424, and we do not think it necessary to reconsider them.

The appellees however insist; that, although lands liable to be assessed are omitted, the only remedy to the landowner was by application for relief to the board of equalization, under sec. 3 of the act of May 14th, 1869, 3- Ind. Stat. 538, of by appeal under sec. 8 of that act. Those sections give no power 'to assess lands omitted. The board can equalize the assessment made. An appeal lies by a person aggrieved by an assessment. No power is given to any court or body, except the assessors, to make any assessment. The power to equalize an assessment made, or to correct it by appeal, is entirely different from the power to make one.

H. W. Harrington, C. A. Korbly, and W. M. Smith, for appellants. C. E. Walker and W. R. Johnston, for appellees.

The judgment of the said Switzerland Circuit Court is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, with instructions to sustain the demurrer to the answer and for further proceedings.

Downey, J., was absent.

Reference

Full Case Name
Manford v. The Pleasant Grove and Indian Creek Turnpike Company
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published