Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson
Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson
64 Ind. 597
Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson
Opinion of the Court
The first error assigned by the appellant on the record of this cause is as follows :
“ 1. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”
And now comes the appellee, by Messrs. Coombs, Morris & Bell, his attorneys, and confesses that the foregoing error is well assigned, and that' his complaint in this case does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The judgment is therefore reversed, at the appellee’s costs, and the cause is remanded, with leave to the appellee to amend his complaint.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.