McDaniel v. Mattingly
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Greenwalt v. State (Ind. 1965)
- Rains v. State (Ind. 1894)
- Heltonville Manufacturing Co. v. Fields (Ind. 1894)
- Rees v. Blackwell (Ind. Ct. App. 1893)
- Zehner v. Aultman (Ind. 1881)
- Swift v. Ratliff (Ind. 1881)
- Wood v. Crane (Ind. 1881)
- Lawless v. Harrington (Ind. 1881)
- Elbert v. Hoby (Ind. 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— The affidavits on which the appellant claims, a new trial, on the ground of newly-discovered evidence,, are not made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions.. Counsel claim no other error. The judgment must therefore be affirmed. Williams v. Potter, post, p. 354; Matlook v. Todd, 19 Ind. 130; Horton v. Wilson, 25 Ind. 316; Burnett v. Overton, 67 Ind. 557; Fryberger v. Perkins, 66 Ind. 19; Berlin v. Oglesbee, 65 Ind. 308; Buskirk’s Practice, 241.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.