Sprinkle v. Toney
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ex parte Sweeney (Ind. 1891)
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Steele (Ind. Ct. App. 1898)
- Pickett v. Hollingsworth (Ind. Ct. App. 1893)
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McDade (Ind. 1887)
- Winship v. Block (Ind. 1884)
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Coyle (Ind. 1882)
- Pennsylvania Co. v. Trimble (Ind. 1881)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— This action originated before a justice of the peace, where trial was had, and judgment rendered for the appellee Toney for $45.50. Appellant appealed to the cir
It is true that the complaint claims eighty dollars, but the judgment appealed from was for forty-five dollars, and with it the appellee was content. The only amount in controversy, therefore, is the sum of forty-five dollars. The appellee is claiming the payment of that sum and no more, and the appellant is simply resisting payment of that sum, for nothing is claimed by way of counter-claim or set-off. If the appeal fails, the appellee can get no more than forty-five dollars, interest, and costs; if it succeeds, the appellant escapes payment of that sum, interest and costs. Halleck v. Weller, 72 Ind. 342.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of appellant..
Opinion filed at November term, 1880.
Petition for a rehearing overruled at May term, 1881.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.