Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Murdock
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. Farnham (Okla. 1893)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellees vigorously maintain that we can not consider any of the questions discussed by appellant, for the reason that it does not affirmatively appear that all of the evidence is in the record. It is true that the evidence is not shown to be all in the bill, and it is also true that the case can not be fully considered, or properly decided, without an examination of the entire evidence, and the contention of appellees must, therefore, prevail.
Judgment affirmed.
Petition for a rehearing overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.