McCann v. Rodifer

Indiana Supreme Court
McCann v. Rodifer, 90 Ind. 602 (Ind. 1883)
Howk

McCann v. Rodifer

Opinion of the Court

Howk, J.

— The paper writing filed in this cause by the appellant, and endorsed as his brief, is merely a copy of the pleading in the record. It •suggests no reason for the reversal of the judgment, it makes no argument, and it cites no authority. It is not a brief of the cause within the requirements of the rules and decisions of this court. Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Wilson v. Holloway, 70 Ind. 407; City of Anderson v. Neal, 88 Ind. 317.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Reference

Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published