Hicks v. State
Hicks v. State
111 Ind. 402; 12 N.E. 522; 1887 Ind. LEXIS 270
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Burkus v. State (Ind. 1933)
- Koscielski v. State (Ind. 1927)
- State v. Poynter (Idaho 1921)
- Pritchard v. State (Ind. 1920)
- State v. Walton (Or. 1907)
- Dansby v. United States (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory 1899)
- State v. Fiester (Or. 1897)
- Gaines v. United States (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory 1895)
- Wise v. Layman (Ind. 1926)
- Phillips v. Gammon (Ind. 1919)
- Mahoney v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 1904)
- Miller v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 1901)
- Manhattan Oil Co. v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 1901)
- Hatfield v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 1894)
- Weir v. State (Ind. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The record not showing that appellant was arraigned or waived it, nor that a plea was entered either by or for him, there is no alternative but to -reverse the judgment. Bowen v. State, 108 Ind. 411, and cases there cited.
The judgment is reversed, and the clerk is directed to make the proper order for the return of appellant to the custody of the sheriff of Switzerland county to await further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.