Moore v. Hammons
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Norris v. Stoneham (Tex. App. 1932)
- Huber v. Tielking (Ind. Ct. App. 1914)
- Henry v. State Ex Rel. Thuermer (Ind. 1926)
- Powell v. . Strickland (N.C. 1913)
- Powell v. Strickland (N.C. 1913)
- Hart v. Knapp (Conn. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellee’s counsel insist that the assignment of errors is not properly in the record because it is pasted to the transcript. We regard this objection as too technical to prevail. Even before the adoption of the present rules the assigment of errors might be made part of the record by permanently attaching it to the transcript, for we
An instruction in an action by a husband for the seduction of his wife which informs the jury that the plaintiff can not recover if the wife consented to the sexual intercourse, is erroneous under any supposable state of the evidence. As the trial court gave such an instruction the judgment must be reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.