Lewis v. Rowland
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Reynolds v. Hill (Okla. 1910)
- State ex rel. Julian v. Board of Metropolitan Police Commissioners (Ind. 1907)
- Big Creek Stone Co. v. Seward (Ind. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Two errors are assigned, as follows:
“ 1st. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the. supplemental complaint.
“ 2d. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.”
The first presents no question for our consideration. A demurrer will not lie to a supplemental complaint. A supplemental complaint is not an independent pleading, but is a mere supplement, or addition, to the original complaint, the two together constituting the complaint. Morey v. Ball, 90 Ind. 450; Derry v. Derry, 98 Ind. 319; Farris v. Jones, 112 Ind. 498; Peters v. Banta, 120 Ind. 416.
The second error assigned, as argued, presents no question but that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the court. The evidence is conflicting, but there is abundance of evidence tending to sustain the finding, and we can not disregard it.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.