Indiana Supreme Court, 1895

Denke-Walter v. Loeper

Denke-Walter v. Loeper
Indiana Supreme Court · Decided December 10, 1895 · Monks
142 Ind. 657; 42 N.E. 358; 1895 Ind. LEXIS 222
Denke-Walter v. Loeper

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Monks, J.

Ida M. Loeper, one of appellees, brought this action against her co-appellees and appellant to quiet title to real estate.

Cross-complaints were filed by certain of the appellees to quiet title to a part of the same real estate.

The cause was tried and judgment rendered quieting the title to said real estate, as prayed for in the complaint and in the cross-complaint. Judgment was also rendered against appellants, Mary O. Denke-Walter and Frederick W. Denke-Walter (who is made an appellee in this court) for costs.

It is settled law in this State that all joint-judgment defendants in the court below must be made co-appellants in this court in all vacation appeals or the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Acts 1895, p. 17 9 ; Elliott App. Proced., section 144; Inman v. Vogel, 141 Ind. 138, and cases cited; Walsh v. Brockway, 13 Ind. App. 70.

There can be but one appeal from the same judgment, and when the same is not a term time appeal all co-parties entitled to- appeal must be joined as co-appellants. Acts 1895, p. 179 ; Inman v. Vogel, supra; Gregory v. Smith, 139 Ind. 48, and cases cited.

The appeal in this case was not a term time appeal and is not therefore governed hy the provisions of the acts approved March 9, 1895. Acts 1895, p. 179.

Frederick W. Denke-Walter was a co-party and joint-judgment defendant with appellant in the court below, and should have been made co-appellant in this court. This not having been done the appeal must be dismissed. Gregory v. Smith, supra; Inman v. Vogel, supra, and cases cited; Midland R. W. Co. v. St. Clair, 42 N. E. Rep. 214.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.