1896
301 Indiana Supreme Court opinions from 1896.
- Roach v. Baker 43 N.E. 932, (Ind. 1896)
- Hilbish v. Hattle 44 N.E. 20, (Ind. 1896)
- Fesler v. Brayton 44 N.E. 37, (Ind. 1896)
- Lowe v. Turpie 44 N.E. 25, (Ind. 1896)
- Bucklen v. Cushman 44 N.E. 6, (Ind. 1896)
- Fletcher v. Monroe 43 N.E. 1053, (Ind. 1896)
- Johnson v. Williams 43 N.E. 1054, (Ind. 1896)
- Richard v. Carrie 43 N.E. 949, (Ind. 1896)
- Boos v. Morgan 43 N.E. 947, (Ind. 1896)
- Miller v. Burks 43 N.E. 930, (Ind. 1896)
- Rhodes v. Town of Brightwood 43 N.E. 942, (Ind. 1896)
- O'Neal v. Hines 43 N.E. 946, (Ind. 1896)
- Wantland v. State 43 N.E. 931, (Ind. 1896)
- Hedrick v. Whitehorn 43 N.E. 942, (Ind. 1896)
- Castle v. Bell 44 N.E. 2, (Ind. 1896)
- Voght v. State 43 N.E. 1049, (Ind. 1896)
- Vandevender v. Moore 44 N.E. 3, (Ind. 1896)
- Pennsylvania Co. v. Ebaugh 43 N.E. 936, (Ind. 1896)
- Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railroad v. Lynch 43 N.E. 934, (Ind. 1896)
- Davis v. Davis 43 N.E. 935, (Ind. 1896)
- Gilliland v. Jones 43 N.E. 939, (Ind. 1896)
- Higgins v. Spahr 43 N.E. 11, (Ind. 1896)
- Woodworth v. State 43 N.E. 933, (Ind. 1896)
- Tucker v. Hyatt 43 N.E. 872, (Ind. 1896)
- State v. Arnold 42 N.E. 1095, (Ind. 1896)
- Boyer v. Robertson 144 Ind. 604, (Ind. 1896)
- Premier Steel Co. v. McElwaine-Richards Co. 43 N.E. 876, (Ind. 1896)
- Keith v. Ault 43 N.E. 924, (Ind. 1896)
- James v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. 43 N.E. 876, (Ind. 1896)
- Dudenhofer v. Johnson 43 N.E. 868, (Ind. 1896)
- Board of Commissioners of Huntington Co. v. Heaston 41 N.E. 457, (Ind. 1896)
- O'Kane v. Terrell 43 N.E. 869, (Ind. 1896)
- Aydelott v. Collings 43 N.E. 867, (Ind. 1896)
- Robb v. State 43 N.E. 642, (Ind. 1896)
- Moores v. Hare 43 N.E. 870, (Ind. 1896)
- Coffin v. State 43 N.E. 654, (Ind. 1896)
- Tolleston Club of Chicago v. Clough 43 N.E. 647, (Ind. 1896)
- Goff v. Hedgecock 43 N.E. 644, (Ind. 1896)
- Blue v. Capital National Bank 43 N.E. 655, (Ind. 1896)
- Krenzer v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. 43 N.E. 649, (Ind. 1896)
- Loucheim v. Seeley 43 N.E. 646, (Ind. 1896)
- Dolin v. Leonard 43 N.E. 568, (Ind. 1896)
- Myers v. Boyd 43 N.E. 567, (Ind. 1896)
- Stony Creek Township v. Kabel 43 N.E. 559, (Ind. 1896)
- Smith v. Mills 43 N.E. 564, (Ind. 1896)
- Blough v. Parry 43 N.E. 560, (Ind. 1896)
- Meyer v. Manhattan Life Insurance 43 N.E. 448, (Ind. 1896)
- Archibald v. Long 43 N.E. 439, (Ind. 1896)
- Kauffman v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. 43 N.E. 446, (Ind. 1896)
- McDonald v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co. 43 N.E. 447, (Ind. 1896)