Indiana Supreme Court, 1906

Haag v. Deter

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided June 29, 1906

167 Ind. 126; 78 N.E. 331; 1906 Ind. LEXIS 17

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Antioch Baptist Church v. Morton (Ind. Ct. App. 1916)
Clarkson v. Wood (Ind. 1907)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In the court below appellee recovered a joint judgment against appellant and one Enyart, and from *127said judgment appellant seeks to prosecute a vacation appeal. Notice has been served on Enyart, but he has not been named as a party in the assignment of errors. Appellee makes this point, and insists on a dismissal of the appeal. Rule six of this court requires that “the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of all the parties,” and under the settled practice this appeal must be dismissed. Elliott, App. Proc., §323; Ewbank’s Manual, §126.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.