Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Richey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. (Ind. Ct. App. 1911)
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Peck (Ind. Ct. App. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The constitutional validity of section one of the employers’ liability act (Acts 1893, p. 294, §8017 Burns 1908) has been firmly settled by the Supreme Court of this State and also by the Supreme Court of the United States. The assertion of appellant’s .counsel that this section is unconstitutional will not serve to lodge the jurisdiction over this appeal in the Supreme Court, which, otherwise, would be in the Appellate Court. It is therefore ordered that this cause be transferred to the Appellate Court. See Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Rogers (1907), 168 Ind. 483.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.