1909
155 Indiana Supreme Court opinions from 1909.
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Morrey 88 N.E. 932, (Ind. 1909)
- Lyle v. State ex rel. Smith 88 N.E. 850, (Ind. 1909)
- Randolph v. City of Indianapolis 88 N.E. 949, (Ind. 1909)
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hollowell 88 N.E. 680, (Ind. 1909)
- City of Indianapolis v. State ex rel. Barnett 132 N.E. 165, (Ind. 1909)
- McClanahan v. Breeding 88 N.E. 695, (Ind. 1909)
- Simplex Railway Appliance Co. v. Western Rawhide & Belting Co. 88 N.E. 682, (Ind. 1909)
- Board of Finance v. State ex rel. Tell City National Bank 88 N.E. 673, (Ind. 1909)
- Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. Roudebush 88 N.E. 676, (Ind. 1909)
- McDonald v. State 88 N.E. 673, (Ind. 1909)
- Korbly v. Loomis 88 N.E. 698, (Ind. 1909)
- Dotterer v. State 88 N.E. 689, (Ind. 1909)
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railway Co. v. Berndt 88 N.E. 612, (Ind. 1909)
- O'Malley v. Quigg 88 N.E. 611, (Ind. 1909)
- Shoaf v. Livengood 88 N.E. 598, (Ind. 1909)
- Ireland v. Huffman 88 N.E. 508, (Ind. 1909)
- Hester v. Town of Greenwood 88 N.E. 498, (Ind. 1909)
- Bruiletts Creek Coal Co. v. Pomatto 88 N.E. 606, (Ind. 1909)
- Rupel v. Ohio Oil Co. 88 N.E. 508, (Ind. 1909)
- Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. Wood 88 N.E. 505, (Ind. 1909)
- Lee v. Shull 88 N.E. 521, (Ind. 1909)
- Wisehart v. Applegate 88 N.E. 501, (Ind. 1909)
- Kime v. Vetter 88 N.E. 497, (Ind. 1909)
- Miller v. Resler 88 N.E. 516, (Ind. 1909)
- Rector v. Druley 88 N.E. 602, (Ind. 1909)
- Clearspring Township v. Blough 88 N.E. 511, (Ind. 1909)
- Romona Oölitic Stone Co. v. Shields 88 N.E. 595, (Ind. 1909)
- Kaufman v. Alexander 88 N.E. 502, (Ind. 1909)
- Zintsmaster v. Aiken 88 N.E. 509, (Ind. 1909)
- State ex rel. Gillispie v. Barr 88 N.E. 604, (Ind. 1909)
- Hoffbauer v. Morgan 88 N.E. 337, (Ind. 1909)
- Rose v. Arford 88 N.E. 302, (Ind. 1909)
- Meek v. State ex rel. Linnville 88 N.E. 299, (Ind. 1909)
- Pitser v. McCreery 88 N.E. 303, (Ind. 1909)
- Waters v. State ex rel. Neff 88 N.E. 67, (Ind. 1909)
- United States Cement Co. v. Cooper 88 N.E. 69, (Ind. 1909)
- Sahm v. State ex rel. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. 88 N.E. 257, (Ind. 1909)
- Carter v. State 87 N.E. 1081, (Ind. 1909)
- Ensley ex rel. Brown v. State 88 N.E. 62, (Ind. 1909)
- City of Cannelton v. Collins 88 N.E. 66, (Ind. 1909)
- Kelley v. Bell 88 N.E. 58, (Ind. 1909)
- McCoy v. Reid 87 N.E. 1086, (Ind. 1909)
- City of New Albany v. New Albany Street Railroad 87 N.E. 1084, (Ind. 1909)
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. State 87 N.E. 1034, (Ind. 1909)
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission 87 N.E. 1030, (Ind. 1909)
- In re Burns 87 N.E. 1028, (Ind. 1909)
- Richey v. State 87 N.E. 1032, (Ind. 1909)
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission 87 N.E. 966, (Ind. 1909)
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Cobler 87 N.E. 981, (Ind. 1909)
- Town of Windfall City v. First National Bank 87 N.E. 984, (Ind. 1909)