The questions presented in this case are identical with those presented in the case of Indiana, etc., Life Ins. Co. v. McGinnis (1913), ante 9. The two appellees in these eases were named as beneficiaries in the same insurance policy, with a definite portion payable to each, and the issues formed are the same in each case.

On the authority of that decision, the judgment of the Marion superior court in this case is affirmed.