State v. Bailey
State v. Bailey
Opinion of the Court
— This is a criminal prosecution in which appellees were charged with a violation of §2465 Burns 1914, Acts 1905 p. 584, §556, which provides that; “Whoever writes, prints, advertises or publishes in any way an account of any lottery, gift enterprise or scheme of chance of any kind or description, by whatever name, style or title the same may be denominated or known, stating when or where the same is to be drawn, what the prizes therein or any of them are, or the price of a ticket, or showing therein where any ticket may be obtained or in any way giving publicity to such lottery, gift enterprise or scheme of chance, shall on conviction, be fined not less than ten dollars nor more than five hundred dollars. ’ ’
Omitting the formal parts of the affidavit on which this action is based, it reads as follows: ‘ ‘ George Windoffer, being duly sworn, says upon his oath that at the county of Howard and State of Indiana, on or about the 30th day of August, 1912, the defendants, Ora W. Bailey and Paul Stanbro did then and there unlawfully write, print, advertise and publish in a certain newspaper called the Kokomo Daily Tribune, an account of a certain lottery, gift enterprise and scheme of chance, called a suit club, showing therein where a ticket may be obtained in said certain lottery, gift enterprise and scheme of chance called a suit club, and did then and there by such writing, printing, advertising and publishing of said account give publicity to said lottery, gift enterprise and scheme of chance called a suit club, which account so written, printed, advertised and published by the defendants in said newspaper was of the following tenor, to wit: ‘Pall Announcement. $2.00 Hats, 50 Styles. Every Hat Guaranteed. Caps 50c to $1.00. Pall Suit Club. Starts Sept. 10. Call at Store. Bailey & Stanbro-, Rear Citizens Bank. $2.00 Hat Store.’ as affiant is informed and verily believes, contrary,” etc. Appellees’ sole objection to the sufficiency of this affidavit is that it “does not state facts sufficient to constitute
Note. — Reported in 108 N. E. 753. As to wliat are lotteries, see 16 Am. St. 42. As to whether the distribution of suits by tailor
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Indiana v. Bailey
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published