Indiana Supreme Court, 1917

Wayne Health & Accident Insurance v. Werkman

Indiana Supreme Court · Decided June 7, 1917 · Spencer

186 Ind. 601; 116 N.E. 420; 1917 Ind. LEXIS 102

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Kirmse v. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. (Ind. Ct. App. 1920)
State ex rel. Fenstermacher v. McNelis (Ind. Ct. App. 1919)
Farmers' Mutual Telephone Co. v. Duncan (Ind. 1917)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Spencer, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee ’for $500 on a complaint based on a policy of insurance issued to Ernest D. Werkman in favor of appellee, his mother. The only question attempted to be presented is the ruling of the court on the motion for a new trial. Only one of the grounds for a new trial is insisted upon by appellants — that is the giving by the court of instruction No. 4 asked by appellee.

Appellant has failed to set out in its brief in narra*602tive form, or in any other manner, any of the evidence introduced in the trial of the cause, as required by the fifth clause of Rule 22 of this court; hence no question is presented on the giving of this instruction. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Hayes (1918), 181 Ind. 87, 102 N. E. 34, 103 N. E. 839; Reister v. Bruning (1910), 47 Ind. App. 570, 572, 94 N. E. 1019. No question having been presented by the briefs, this judgment is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 116 N. E. 420.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.